Poetic Terrorism

Here’s a question: If you put up a tightrope between two of the highest buildings in the world and tried to walk from one building to the next – how far would you get?

A frenchman who did just that, back in 1974, didn’t limit himself to walking from one end to the other. He managed to lie on the rope and look at the sky. He was able to kneel down and salute his audience, a quarter mile below him. Ultimately, he mocked the police for almost 45 minutes, until he decided to leave the wire for good before they would send a helicopter to get him.

But the story gets even more amazing: As narrated in the documentary film Man on Wire, once the frenchman delivered himself to the cops, they took him to a prosecutor – who offered to drop charges if he would perform a live show to the crowd waiting outside. He was welcomed by an amazed audience, and by a groupie who immediately took him home to relax on her waterbed. Later on, the same guy was awarded a permanent entry card to the sightseeing platform of the skyscrapers he had conquered.

The frenchman was Philippe Petit, the skyscrapers were the twin towers of the World Trade Center, and his prank was certainly one of the most amazing acts of poetic terrorism the world has ever seen.

Kidnap Someone & Make them Happy

The Urban Dictionary knows: “Poetic terrorism differs from the concept of ‘random acts of kindness’ in that its acts are not always kind, but its ultimate goal is not malice, but broadening of the mind.” ((Wikipedia doesn’t even have an entry for the term, despite having one for a music album of the same name. That alone speaks volumes.))

In the words of lifestyle anarchist ((That label was originally an attack on Bey by Murray Bookchin. I somehow feel it’s more a decoration than an insult, so I use it here.)) Hakim Bey, inventor of the term poetic terrorism:

“Weird dancing in all-night computer-banking lobbies. Unauthorized pyrotechnic displays. Land-art, earth-works as bizarre alien artifacts strewn in State Parks. Burglarize houses but instead of stealing, leave Poetic-Terrorist objects. Kidnap someone & make them happy. Pick someone at random & convince them they’re the heir to an enormous, useless & amazing fortune – say 5000 square miles of Antarctica, or an aging circus elephant, or an orphanage in Bombay, or a collection of alchemical mss.

Later they will come to realize that for a few moments they believed in something extraordinary, and will perhaps be driven as a result to seek out some more intense mode of existence.”

Why (Or: Why Not?)

When asked about the “why” of his act on the wire, Philippe Petit refused to answer. Still, he certainly had a good reason; he just didn’t see the need to articulate it: Why he did it? – Why not? Petit did what he did because it seemed like the right thing to do. He wanted to “believe in something extraordinary”, “to seek out some more intense mode of existence”.

Coming back to my question from the beginning of this post: I didn’t ask you about your tightrope walking skills to test your sportsmanship. Yours truly wouldn’t be able to walk more than two steps on that wire, even if it was hanging half a meter above the ground. But to me, the real issue is that if you tried to pull off a prank like that in the New York City of our days, you would get shot by a SWAT team before you could even floss your teeth.

Sadly enough, it’s real terrorism that brought us to this point. Terrorism that destroyed the very buildings Petit walked on. Terrorism that killed thousands of innocent people. What worries me, though, is that our fear of terror has taken us to a point where we cannot distinguish anymore between friend and foe; between a justified longing for security and the necessary risks we need to accept in order to be free; between terrorism that kills and poetic terrorism that makes our lives meaningful and interesting.

Ultimately, I think that loss of differentiation tells a story about our society. ((I count myself to be a part of that society, even though I’m not a US citizen, nor have I lived there for a longer period of time. Things in Germany don’t look all that different.)) It tells a story about us. It tells a story about the lives we’re living – and, implicitly, a story about the lives we might want to live instead.

Life on a Tightrope

Let’s look at Bey’s poetic terrorism once more: “Later they will come to realize that for a few moments they believed in something extraordinary, and will perhaps be driven as a result to seek out some more intense mode of existence.”

Make people believe in something extraordinary.
Make them seek out some more intense mode of existence.

Isn’t that something worth pursuing?

You don’t have to harm anybody to do that. You don’t have to force anybody to do that. It may already be enough to do something beautifully crazy, and make them a part of it, a witness. Just as Philippe Petit did, that day on the wire between the twin towers: Thousands of spectators were touched. Thousands of spectators got a message. Thousands of spectators were taken, for a brief moment in time, to a totally different reality. Even the police officer who received Petit once he left the wire said, in not-all-that-concealed admiration: “I observed the tightrope dancer – because you couldn’t call him a walker – approximately half-way between the two towers. I personally figured I was watching something that somebody else would never see again in the world. Thought it was once in a lifetime.”

Think about that: “Never again […] in the world”, “once in a lifetime.” The rareness of the event made it even more precious. But wouldn’t it be great if more of us experienced moments like this?

The twin towers are gone now. Due to real terrorism. Fuck that. What we need is a lot less violence. And a bit more poetic terrorism.

Petit said: “Life should be lived on the edges of life. You have to exercise rebellion to refuse to tape yourself to rules, to refuse your own success, to refuse to repeat yourself, to see every day, every year, every idea as a true challenge – and then you are going to live your life on a tightrope.”

See, there are other towers out there. Higher towers. Towers to climb on. Towers to connect with a rope. And boy, ain’t there a lot of tightropes! Both literally and metaphorically. What are you waiting for? Amaze some people. Amaze yourself. Be a poetic terrorist. Go walk on wire.

TL;DR

Walk on a wire. Do weird things. Astound your spectators. Be a poetic terrorist.

Srinivas Rao At Work: “World War III is not gonna erupt in your inbox”

Srinivas RaoAfter an excellent start of this series with Joel Runyon, I’m happy to publish the second At Work interview today. In an extremely interesting conversation we had via Skype, Srinivas Rao from Blogcast FM and The Skool of Life talks about distraction-free writing, the 80% crap ratio, and how he finds the fuel to his creative fire.

Listen in to the recording of our conversation right here: Srinivas Rao At Work – Interview

A full transcript (4600+ words!) in a beautiful PDF will be sent around to subscribers of Mails Beyond Rules. If you’d like to get it, why not become a (free!) subscriber?

Links and Resources

Here are links to the resources mentioned in the interview:

Action Bias

Wikipedia on social desirability bias:

Social desirability bias is the tendency of respondents to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favorably by others. It can take the form of over-reporting good behavior or under-reporting bad behavior. The tendency poses a serious problem with conducting research with self-reports, especially questionnaires. This bias interferes with the interpretation of average tendencies as well as individual differences.

We always report success.
We usually report action.
We rarely report failures.
We never report idleness.

Is our perception of the world distorted by an action bias?

At Work: Joel Runyon (Impossible HQ)

Joel RunyonAs announced last week, here’s the first post in a new TFA series: The At Work interviews! Today, we’ll meet my blogging friend Joel Runyon of Boing Boing and Oprah fame.

In this At Work interview, Joel talks about his different focuses and his daily schedule. Let’s jump right into it!

Hey Joel! Overall, what is the kind of work that you do? How many areas of focus do you have?

I have a few different focuses. I write quite a bit for my Blog of Impossible Things, Impossible HQ, and a niche adrenaline site called Nerve Rush. I also run a focused online marketing agency where I handle SEO and PPC for a select few clients.

Do you have any specific time at which you normally get up? Do you use an alarm clock or do you just sleep until you’re well-rested?

I sleep until I’m well rested. I usually try to be up around 8, although that changes as I’ll stay up late working on interesting projects. I try to stay away from alarm clocks unless it’s a really early morning start.

Do you have any routines? (Do you get right to work after getting up or do you first dedicate time to some other things – breakfast, shower, get into your office dress, take a run, have a glass of red wine…?)

I work out first thing in the morning, shower and have breakfast while checking email. I check my schedule for the day and get to work, which varies based on the day.

Any rituals to find focus? (For example, author Steven Pressfield always takes a moment to say a prayer, the “Invocation of the Muse” from Homer’s Odyssey, before starting to work.)

If I’m particularly distracted one day, I’ll simply take a break and go take a walk or do something completely non-related to what I’m doing. I find, instead of having little distractions all over the place for the entire day – I’ll completely unfocus, do something ridiculous and get it all out of my system at once. Then, when I come back to my work – I can really settle in and focus on things.

Where do you work? Any important things in your work environment?

Usually a simple clean desk and some good background music are enough to get me into my rhythm. I travel a lot so I don’t have a designated work station.

What tools do you use to help you get things done? (Lists, apps, agendas…)

I probably spend most of my time in the following apps:

  • Excel
  • WordPress
  • Word
  • Adwords Editor
  • Gmail
  • Shopify
  • Evernote
  • Dropbox
  • Buffer app
  • Skype
  • Google voice
  • Google docs

(Side note – I’m actually working on something like this coming up soon that pulls all the apps together – probably 2 months out, but could be really interesting…)

How many hours do you work on a normal day? Do you take pauses as they come or at specific and fixed times?

I work 8-10 hours a day. I’m still in the startup phase of my work so I try to work as efficiently as I can during that timeframe. I usually take break sporadically as they find natural places throughout my workday.

Also, handstand breaks are great ways to break up the day.

Do you use any timeboxing techniques (like a fixed agenda or the pomodoro technique)? Or do you prefer to work more impulsively, depending on the current state of things, taks from your email inbox, and so on?

I naturally work more impulsively – gravitating towards the things I’m most interested in. I do work to keep specific things like client calls relegated to one or two specific days out of the week. Also, when I get started writing, I usually go into a “writing mode” where I write for a few hours at a time and really focus in on things. I’ve tried the pomodoro technique, but I tend to find better results with a 50/10 work/break split than a 25/5 as it gives me more uninterrupted thought time.

Thanks a lot for your time, Joel!