Start to Care

Interesting thought by Ran Prieur on social class in the future: ((Most of Ran’s blog entries don’t have a permalink. You can find the relevant passages in his posts from November 28 and 29.))

Social class will no longer be about power or even standard of living, but valuable activity. The upper class will hold the few important jobs that still require humans. The middle class will be hobbyists, practicing difficult skills that are not necessary for society. And the lower class will be content to consume entertainment.

His post was triggered by a long article by Sister Y on the importance of demandingness in work and culture: If work is too easy to do (or, in a consumer culture, things are too easy to buy and own), it becomes fungible and won’t give us the deep satisfaction we get from doing things that increase our value (to ourselves and our peers) and allow us to get feedback on it.

Interestingly, a solution to this problem was published around the same time in an (otherwise unrelated) article by Cal Newport: Deep work.

Cal describes how knowledge workers don’t have a “culture of systematic improvement”, leading careers that neglect the qualitative refinement of work. His proposed solution is to engage in deep work, i.e. to look for harder things to do and spend more time doing them. The key benefits:

1. Continuous improvement of the value of your work output.
2. An increase in the total quantity of valuable output you produce.
3. Deeper satisfaction (aka., “passion”) for your work.

The intriguing implication of this is that by extending deep work we could actually choose our class affiliation (in Ran Prieur’s sense): Instead of being content with escaping from an unfulfilling existence into entertainment and distraction, we might as well accept the challenge and get better at what we do. Considering the increased satisfaction obtained from deep work, the reward will be much higher than mere monetary remuneration.

So how can we do more deep work? Cal lists four steps, but the one I would like to add (and put right at the beginning), is this: Start to care. Start to care about what you do and how you spend your day. Start to care about the quality of your work output and start to care about how you could improve it. Stop living life by default and instead begin to improve what you do, one step at a time.

This isn’t just true for the classic “white-collar worker”, mind you. It’s true for every blogger, creative, and solopreneur: Don’t accept to be mediocre anymore. Don’t take the shortcut to money and fame. Don’t just rely on SEO and “100 proven tactics to grow your e-mail list”. Instead, start to care – and go deeper.

An Autumn Story

Some of you have seen it already, some have not: Over the last few months, I have been publishing a kind of (abstract) visual diary on my new photo site, Bokehlist.

If you are missing the visual updates I used to publish here on The Friendly Anarchist, now is the perfect moment to check Bokehlist out: I just started publishing a new photo essay that’s all about autumn. Starting today (and with updates on December 13, 17 and 20), my autumn story is going live. Get all the updates by subscribing to the Bokehlist RSS feed or by signing up to Mails Beyond Rules.

Good Reads, This-Time-of-the-Year-Again Edition

It’s this time of the year again!™  Why not make it Christmas at your own pace – maybe for the first time in your life? Something like natale giusto

My Italian isn’t to be trusted, but the idea behind it would be having a suitable Christmas. Suitable for you, that is: No stress, no frills, no drama. Most certainly: No gifts, or at least less of them. (Giving gifts is great as long as it doesn’t freak you out. Let the gifts come from the heart rather than from a feeling of obligation. Tell your friends, too, and you’ll receive less stuff to clutter your house!)

In the meantime, good things have been published around the web. Here are some of my favorites from recent weeks. And you can immediately find out why I’d strongly suggest enjoying these articles with a good cup of coffee – by reading the first quote!

[¶]

“What I tell patients is, if you like coffee, go ahead and drink as much as you want and can,” says Dr. Peter Martin, director of the Institute for Coffee Studies at Vanderbilt University. He’s even developed a metric for monitoring your dosage: If you are having trouble sleeping, cut back on your last cup of the day. From there, he says, “If you drink that much, it’s not going to do you any harm, and it might actually help you. A lot.”

The case for drinking as much coffee as you like. (I’m getting nervous just by thinking about how much coffee I’m now offically allowed to have.)

[¶]

I don’t have a website. I’ve never tweeted. I’ve never even texted. I have a job. All young photographers want to be famous, but I came to the conclusion a long time ago that it was too much work. You always have to be out there selling yourself. It’s just something I don’t want to spend my time doing. I’d rather be drinking a beer on the patio watching fireflies than emailing people to show them my portfolio. I’m lazy when it comes to publicity and if it happens, it happens. I’m not adverse to talking about stuff, I just don’t want to have to go and pursue it.

Very interesting interview with Dennis Darling. What might look like just another grumpy old man to some seems more like a very smart person to me. Here’s to not becoming famous (and the advantages of under-the-radar fame, of course)!

[¶]

Thus, whenever I see people offering resoundingly negative reflections on the lack of money in online writing, I cannot help but feel somewhat upset. Perhaps there is little money, but that is not the only source of profit you can elicit from writing. Nor should it be the focus of it.

Anything you earn whilst writing — be it money, friends, connections, or otherwise — is a gift that you would not have had otherwise.

This quote by Matt Alexander somehow hits into the same direction as Darling above: It’s not all about frontpage fame and sensationalism, nor about making boatloads of money. Or at least it doesn’t have to.

What always strikes me as funny is how people go crazy about converting their passion into a business, only to then become addicted to external recognization (money, fame) – hence, ultimately, losing their passion rather than building up on it.

This is a longer discussion though, and I’ll probably better get back to it in a separate post.

Anyway, Matt’s other lessons learned after one year of writing are also worth reading.

[¶]

Maybe one more addition to the issue of fame (and marks), provided by the wise William Deresiewicz: What are you going to do with that?

A couple of years ago, I participated in a panel discussion at Harvard that dealt with some of these same matters, and afterward I was contacted by one of the students who had come to the event, a young woman who was writing her senior thesis about Harvard itself, how it instills in its students what she called self-efficacy, the sense that you can do anything you want. Self-efficacy, or, in more familiar terms, self-esteem. There are some kids, she said, who get an A on a test and say, “I got it because it was easy.” And there are other kids, the kind with self-efficacy or self-esteem, who get an A on a test and say, “I got it because I’m smart.”

Again, there’s nothing wrong with thinking that you got an A because you’re smart. But what that Harvard student didn’t realize—and it was really quite a shock to her when I suggested it—is that there is a third alternative. True self-esteem, I proposed, means not caring whether you get an A in the first place. […]

Here are some oither quotes that I loved from that piece:

If you’re going to invent your own life, if you’re going to be truly autonomous, you also need courage: moral courage. […]

People don’t mind being in prison as long as no one else is free. But stage a jailbreak, and everybody else freaks out. […]

Who wants to let a 12-year-old decide what they’re going to do for the rest of their lives? Or a 19-year-old, for that matter? […]

[¶]

So what do we do to not let that 12-year-old decide what we’re going to do with our lives? We simply decide to live more than just one life. How about eleven?

[¶]

Around those eleven lives, lots of goodness from J.D. Moyer: A System for Exploring Life Purpose and Setting a Primary Goal. Don’t let that descriptive headline put you off. It’s a very smart post on a topic many of us struggle with. Read it and act on it. Here’s an excerpt:

I’ll just say this — if you haven’t taken the time to understand and define your own purpose in life, why set goals at all? If you don’t know where you’re going, “no wind is the right wind.” I realize it might feel overwhelming … you could choose to dedicate your life to literally anything. But what is most important of all, to you? To love? To learn? To teach? To create? To explore? To thrive? To help those in need?

[¶]

Last but not least, it looks like people called J.D. are on a roll these days! Here’s digital ascetic, J.D. Bentley publicly thinking about the direction his (last) life has taken. This is such a good example of fine writing on the blog, and how not all great blog posts have to be immediately actionable (and include a top 10 list):

Cooking is both mechanical and poetic. There are a set of rules I know to be true. They provide a framework. Inside of that framework is the possibility for endless variety. You can take someone else’s idea—usually called a recipe—and make it your own. All it takes is some purposeful experimentation, or some laziness, or some forgetfulness, or some half-assing, to create the most delicious dish that has ever existed and may never exist again.

That’s the thrill of it. This might be the best steak the world has ever known and there’s a 90% chance that I won’t know why and a 90% chance I’ll never be able to reproduce it.

Go read the whole thing.

Nobody’s Gotta Do It

So I was standing in the supermarket, looking at the myriad of TV guides that you can buy everywhere here in Germany. They all look the same: In the center of the cover, there’s a blonde, smiling, voluptuous, overly photoshopped, female model/actor/musician/TV host on a blue background. At the top, the logo of the guide in huge letters. At the borders, lots of smaller, overly saturated images and flashy typography.

Pretty ugly, pretty repetitive, pretty boring. But: There’s probably a whole office of employees involved to create each of these guides; writing ridiculous “articles” ((I’m talking of print magazines, but these texts don’t even deserve to be called articles. We should just call them posts.)), putting the TV program into tiny columns, inventing excessively positive movie critiques, and doing the layout of it all. Not to count the people handling advertising, printing, delivery, and whatnot.

As I stood there, I wondered: Why do people even do this kind of stuff?

To be sure, the problem isn’t that there’s a certain style of TV guide being created. The problem is that there are probably two dozen of them, and they all look the same. The problem is that there isn’t real value being created, but just people being occupied.

The usual answer to my question is: “Well, it makes money. Somebody’s gotta do it.”

And we willingly accept this answer, even when it’s utter bullshit that simply emerges from our overvaluation of regular employment and regular paychecks. Or of making money with a mediocre business model as long as possible – and falling into a hole once it stops being profitable. (And it will stop; sooner rather than later.)

The truth is: Nobody’s gotta do it. Why would any even remotely intelligent person be willing to spend their time making yet another TV guide?

Needs and wants differ, of course. Why not be happy working for a glossy magazine? The problem is that merely copying what already exists cannot be sustainable in the long run.

If you’re into gossip and Shakira and red carpets, why not make something worthwhile of it? Why not buy a photo from a decent photographer? Do some post-processing that’s intriguing, instead of simply masking any wrinkles in Shakira’s skin? Spend some time on actual research about Brangelina adopting their 21st child from Ghana and put it into a larger context? Ask a few upcoming musicians to create a remix CD to include as a give-away?

Most certainly, it’s just not worth it: People who buy a TV guide care about the TV program. And nothing more. The articles are like the ridiculous “bonuses” online marketers like to give away with their products. Hollow and useless, but they suggest a value that in reality might just not be there. Similarly, the cover blonde delivers the sex people love to pay for.

And still: Why not make it better?

It doesn’t have to be about passion. But it has to be about quality: I’m fed up with the bullshit that’s being sold in the malls and supermarkets – and on the web. Nobody’s gotta do it. Instead, how about making something that has a longer shelf life than next Sunday?

Michael Nobbs At Work: “Discipline within what’s possible”

Michael NobbsTime is running and it’s At Work day once again! A few weeks ago I was so lucky to talk to illustrator and blogger Michael Nobbs about his auto-pilot GTD system, doing creative work despite having little energy (or time), discipline, and the advantages of having a sofa in the studio.

Listen in to the recording of our conversation right here: Michael Nobbs At Work – Interview

A full transcript (6000+ words!) in a beautiful PDF will be sent around to subscribers of Mails Beyond Rules. If you’d like to get it, why not become a (free!) subscriber?

Links and Resources

Here are links to the resources mentioned in the interview: